Majordomo-Users: Re: Insecure dependency in majordomo??

Majordomo-Users
(May 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Insecure dependency in majordomo??
From:	Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ hpc . uh . edu>
Date:	12 May 1998 21:20:02 -0500
To:	Scott David Gray <sdavid @ tiac . net>
Cc:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Scott David Gray's message of "Tue, 12 May 1998 20:46:40 -0400 (EDT)"
References:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.980512204150.1715A-120000@sdavid.tiac.net>

>>>>> "SDG" == Scott David Gray <sdavid@tiac.net> writes:

SDG> Insecure dependency in require while running setuid at
SDG> /usr/local/majordomo/majordomo line 47.

This message is issued by perl when running a script with the -T option, or
when running a script that has the setuid bit set.  A proper installation
has neither of these.

Does 'majordomo' have the setuid bit turned on for some odd reason?  How
did it get turned on?

 - J<

References:

Insecure dependency in majordomo??
From: Scott David Gray <sdavid@tiac.net>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Bounces and undeliverable messages set to the subscribers From: Richard Sharpe <sharpe@ns.aus.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Independent Price Survey of 175 Life Insurance Companies From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Insecure dependency in majordomo?? From: Scott David Gray <sdavid@tiac.net>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Bounces and undeliverable messages set to the subscribers From: Richard Sharpe <sharpe@ns.aus.com>