Majordomo-Users: Re: Listsize of 100,000+

Majordomo-Users
(May 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Listsize of 100,000+
From:	Dave Sill <de5 @ sws5 . ctd . ornl . gov>
Organization:	Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA
Date:	Thu, 21 May 98 15:32:20 EST
To:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	<ufa4syja71y.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>
References:	<000a01bd84cc$2c135060$46b1040c@sl.nashbar.com><ufa4syja71y.fsf@sina.hpc.uh.edu>

Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> "SL" == Stephen Labedz <sl@nashbar.com> writes:
>
>SL> My list has over 100,000 subscribers.
>
>It is completely, absolutely meaningless to mention list size without
>mentioning list traffic patterns and maximum allowed turnaround time.

Not to mention the distribution of zubscribers (local vs. remote) and
the rate of zubscribes/unzubscribes.

-Dave

References:

Listsize of 100,000+
From: "Stephen Labedz" <sl@nashbar.com>
Re: Listsize of 100,000+
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	announce-only lists From: Chris Magnuson <chrism@peakpeak.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: lists w/ mixed letters From: Dave Sill <de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: Listsize of 100,000+ From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	blind copies From: Christopher Adams <chris@sparkie.osl.state.or.us>