Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Russ Allbery <rra @ stanford . edu>
Date: 23 Jun 1998 03:41:11 -0700
To: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: "Michael"'s message of "Mon, 22 Jun 1998 16:42:42 +0000"
References: <199806222342.QAA11334@bzs.org>

Michael <michael@bizsystems.com> writes:

> If a reply-to header is included in the config file, bounces are sent
> there rather than to the owner-<list name> unless a moderator is also
> specified.

Are you sure about this?  I run quite a few lists with reply-to set (aside
to the peanut gallery:  I've read the URL, I've read the arguments, and
I'm still doing it this way, so spare me and the list the rehash please)
and I've *never* seen this behavior.

Are you sure that you're not just encountering a remote system that
doesn't understand that errors should go to the envelope sender rather
than to the address information in the message?

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)         <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Digests still....
From: "Michael Stinson" <michaels@ix.gen.com>
Next: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Malcolm Campbell <malcolmc@europe.shiva.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Dave Sill <de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Next: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Malcolm Campbell <malcolmc@europe.shiva.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com