Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(June 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Ben Smithurst <ben @ scientia . demon . co . uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 14:27:01 +0100 (BST)
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.95.980623220855.3286B-100000@queernet.queernet.org>

On Tue, 23 Jun 1998, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:

> You've also made it MUCH more difficult for your users to save
> bandwidth by replying only to the originator, turning your list into
> only an all-to-all jabber.

But *most* replies go to the list, which setting reply_to list makes
easy. It is only occasionally that someone replies direct to me, and
maybe others. So I think reply_to list makes the *majority* of replies
more convenient, and people can, and do, reply to me directly, not via
the list, when they need to.

JMHO, of course

-- 
Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk> <http://www.scientia.demon.co.uk/>



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: receipt requests?
From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Next: "can't create output" error
From: "Joshua Greer" <jgreer@newyork.edisonproject.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: John W Baxter <jwblist@olympus.net>
Next: Re: possible bug in 1.9.4
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com