Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Barr <barr @ cis . ohio-state . edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 12:37:46 -0400
To: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Jul 1998 10:00:37 EST." <19980714140037.29368.qmail@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>

>As for (b), it's impossible for each site on the Internet to know
>every other site's resources. That's why the remote sites *have* to be
>responsible for controlling their own resource usage.

How true.

How many times have we heard horror stories about hoxes, spam, etc causing
floods of postmaster@ and abuse@ mail to a site causing their mail system
to repeatedly crash and burn under the load?

How many sendmail sites are merely time bombs waiting to go off?

Obviously you can't have perfect solutions, but systems should be
demand tolerant enough to handle overloaded conditions gracefully.

I'm not saying qmail is perfect -- far from it.  However we're entering
a new age, and that requires thinking about things that weren't big
issues before.

--Dave


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Barr <barr@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Ok, that's enough (was Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: David Smith <smithd@blkbox.com>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com