Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Barr <barr @ cis . ohio-state . edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 12:33:22 -0400
To: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Jul 1998 11:40:38 EDT." <199807141540.LAA00114@eclectic.kluge.net>

>I think the concept was:
>
>Mail is important, but very few (if any) mailing lists are *time critical*?  
>Most people consider mailing list traffic as important, but low priority.  If 
>it takes an extra hour to process the whole list, so be it.

Yes, but that's only an issue for smaller sites.  The fact that qmail
processes a given mail to a given list so much faster is only a side
benefit.  qmail works just as well for single mail messages to one
reciepient.

Why should mail to a mailing list, which you say is okay to be delayed
an extra hour or so, back up normal mail which is time critical?
This isn't supposed to be a problem with sendmail, but it is.

The fact is that the public expects personal mail to be delivered in minutes,
not hours.  They should!

--Dave


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Ok, that's enough (was Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: David Smith <smithd@blkbox.com>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Barr <barr@cis.ohio-state.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com