Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(July 1998)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Leslie Mikesell <les @ Mcs . Net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 15:02:43 -0500 (CDT)
To: de5 @ sws5 . ctd . ornl . gov (Dave Sill)
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <19980714185719.4026.qmail@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov> from "Dave Sill" at Jul 14, 98 02:57:19 pm

According to Dave Sill:
> 
> 
> >the AOL MX needs 20 instances of its MTA to handle this traffic.
> 
> Only because AOL uses a monlithic MTA (sendmail). To accept a message
> via SMTP, AOL has to load the entire sendmail system: SMTP daemon,
> queue manager, config file parser, delivery router, alias database
> rebuilder, queue pretty printer, SMTP client, etc.--most of which are
> just dead weight.

They aren't dead weight.  Each of those steps still has to happen for
every message.

> If they used a modular MTA like qmail or VMailer, they'd only have to
> fork an SMTP daemon for each connection.

That goes as far as writing the queue file.  Now what? 

  Les Mikesell
    les@mcs.com


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Sill <de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>
Next: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Dave Sill <de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.gov>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com