Majordomo-Users: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)

Majordomo-Users
(July 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From:	Dave Barr <barr @ cis . ohio-state . edu>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:52:17 -0400
To:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Your message of "15 Jul 1998 13:02:32 EDT." <x7vhozxd1z.fsf@gkar.prescienttech.com>

>Your logic is flawed, Dave.  One instance of sendmail does the same job as
>20 instances of qmail-smtp.

And you say Dave's logic is flawed?

How can you possibly support this statement?

--Dave

Follow-Ups:

Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

References:

Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: mailing lists and MTA's From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Version 2.0? From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@hpc.uh.edu>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>