-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dave Sill writes:
> Yes, in this scenario that's true (ignoring the meaninglessness of
> "instances of qmail"). It also takes the single sendmail about 20
> times as long. Which is precisely *why* DJB designed qmail to do
> parallel delivery.
Substantiate the claim.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.0 Business Edition
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNa0RrZ6VRH7BJMxHAQFt0AP/fPSY8OEszA1mUd3a1m5de0+YJGGNi2HP
dWcdX1zZanBlLklqNqSTfIpeH0dM/OHs2PvcN4MU7ZE5z+9H7vsrqoNsgUbqidke
xU5eU2dp5bi5fpGVUjrKfYvabo7IBtsSIc+ZxhlpNSvxSMe0j1rXsjn0+eE5Syzs
/RMeuiVFFJ8=
=oogD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> / Happy Fun Ball contains a liquid
Sysmonster, Unix Wrangler / core, which, if exposed due to
Prescient Technologies, Inc. / rupture, should not be touched,
I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC / inhaled, or looked at.
References:
|
|
