Majordomo-Users: Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)

Majordomo-Users
(July 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From:	Dave Barr <barr @ cis . ohio-state . edu>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jul 1998 16:33:06 -0400
To:	majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to:	Your message of "15 Jul 1998 12:28:23 EDT." <x7zpebxemw.fsf@gkar.prescienttech.com>

>It is qmail and its proponents that are claiming that qmail is superior to
>sendmail.  The burden of proving that claim rests on qmail and its
>proponents.  In other words, put up or shut up.

The performance numbers are there for all to see at qmail.org.
DJB has published numerous performance figures, as have others.

You were speculating by saying that certain things X did were
faster than Y, yet gave no facts to back your claims.

--Dave

Follow-Ups:

Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) -- My Final Word
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

References:

Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.)
From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) From: Reinhard Zierke <zierke@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: MTA's (was: VERY large mailing lists.) -- My Final Word From: Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com>