-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dave Sill writes:
>> The ENTIRE Discussion as about the rudeness of sender-side qmail.
> Right, but I pointed out a few rounds back that one of the reasons
> it's considered rude (by some) is because the receivers are running
> monolithic MTA's,
And as I pointed out a few rounds back, forking 20 nearly simultaneous
copies of qmail-smtp incurs an instantaneous load 20 times greater than
forking a single copy of qmail-smtp.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 4.0 Business Edition
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNa0ZHZ6VRH7BJMxHAQEOoQQAjpOWfzb8AKdw5Kq81q4DZhH3Tr9iT07D
ffsfmGP4Seq3xk2I2cYETA7AUxjeZ5RSjyiqoUsAZ34/+sfAihrvSj7ql6ukh0IH
LlKuZXFPkjOF0FY0A7iZLmFwLiLLpe9H4EavVwtgqGoRqTOcSgpM85qiTzC47xnx
/WSREmnydr4=
=+2t9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Rich Pieri <rich.pieri@prescienttech.com> / Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain
Sysmonster, Unix Wrangler / types of skin.
Prescient Technologies, Inc. /
I speak for myself, not PTI or SWEC /
References:
|
|
