Majordomo-Users: Re: message size restriction.

Majordomo-Users
(September 1998)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: message size restriction.
From:	Darren Wyn Rees <merlin @ A470 . demon . co . uk>
Date:	Sun, 13 Sep 1998 13:41:04 -0400
To:	Mark Lewis <discuss . m @ rk . to>, majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to:	<199809130922080090.0481DC3A@hades.myth.co.uk>; from Mark Lewis on Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 09:22:08AM +0100
References:	<19980912183624.2010.qmail@A470.demon.co.uk> <199809130922080090.0481DC3A@hades.myth.co.uk>

On Sun, Sep 13, 1998 at 09:22:08AM +0100, Mark Lewis wrote:

> if i reduced the maxlength
> from the default 40000 to 5000, will the message truncate or simply fail to
> post?

It'll fail to post and bounce to the list-owner (IIRC).

-- 
Darren Rees		merlin@cvnet.co.uk

A chwe nycho'r cyfan a gyll y cyfan.
All covet, all lose.

References:

Re: message size restriction.
From: merlin@A470.demon.co.uk (Darren Rees)
Re: message size restriction.
From: "Mark Lewis" <discuss.m@rk.to>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: message size restriction. From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Taboo or not Taboo? From: "St.Einar" <st.einar@bigfoot.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: message size restriction. From: Jeffrey Goldberg <J.Goldberg@Cranfield.ac.uk>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: message size restriction. From: "St.Einar" <st.einar@bigfoot.com>