Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(January 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: proper version of perl
From: Richard Welty <rwelty @ neworks . net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 09:32:42 -0800
To: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs @ math . uh . edu>
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <ufaaez6ezwu.fsf@epithumia.math.uh.edu>
References: <Richard Welty's message of "Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:00:16 -0800"><E1059yz-0003iI-00@mail.neworks.net>

At 10:56 AM 1/26/99 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:

>The Perl that comes with 5.1 should be OK.  It's 5.2 where they shipped a
>development release renamed to something else.  Why they would do this, I
>don't know, but they don't seem to care much about it.  (They whined about
>no fixed version of Perl being available, which makes no sense to me.)

>Anyway, Perl 5.005_02 or Perl 5.004_04 should be fine.  The big difference
>between them is that 5.005_02 has the new regexp functionality.

thanks.

it wasn't completely obvious if the perl in 5.1 was alright or not, as it
wasn't certain that the name redhat used for the rpm really and truly
matched the perl release -- so i grabbed the 5.005_02 sources and built
that -- and it all seems to be working fine.

richard

-- 
Richard Welty
rwelty@neworks.net
phone: 518-244-9630  --  fax: 518-244-9696
http://www.neworks.net/



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: why won't my digests go out?
From: Jeff Rose <jrose@elug.org>
Next: Re: Capacity planning
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden@mr.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: proper version of perl
From: Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs@math.uh.edu>
Next: Cannot send to majordomo
From: Raymond Roesch <Raymond.Roesch@sws.ch>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com