Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(January 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Web appr0ve patch: problem, solution, & question
From: Omar Thameen <omar @ clifford . inch . com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:16:11 -0500
To: Bill Houle <bhoule @ sandiegoca . ncr . com>
Cc: Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <199901252346.PAA29859@intelpo.sandiegoca.ncr.com>; from Bill Houle on Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:46:24PM -0800
References: <19990125130757.B23267@clifford.inch.com> <199901252346.PAA29859@intelpo.sandiegoca.ncr.com>

On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 03:46:24PM -0800, Bill Houle wrote:
> Omar Thameen said:
> > 
> > - From the comments in the patch, it seems that if I appr0ve via email,
> >   the message should be deleted from the webqueue, but I am not seeing
> >   this happen - the message stays.  I haven't looked at this part of
> >   the code yet, but if anyone has any tips, it would be appreciated.
> 
> In theory, it saves to a filename based on the Message-Id. Appr0ving
> via mail has access to the ID and should delete the corresponding
> file. Messages w/o an ID are assigned a random file number and are
> not removed via mail approval (since it has no knowledge of the
> number saved during the original queueing).

The message id that the bounce patch produces is missing the "@".
This must be why it's not able to match the incoming email message id.
I don't see where in the code it's being removed, however.

Omar


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Capacity planning
From: "Robert A. Hayden" <rhayden@mr.net>
Next: Re: quoted printable in mail bodies and digests and archives
From: Mats Dufberg <Mats.Dufberg@abc.se>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Web appr0ve patch: problem, solution, & question
From: Bill Houle <bhoule@sandiegoca.ncr.com>
Next: Re: Web appr0ve patch: problem, solution, & question
From: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com