On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Robert Heller wrote:
> My question: commenting out these lines seem to 'fix' things (things
> appear to be working), but have I broken things? I don't know perl well
> enough to know what is wrong with the original code and don't have a clue
> as to the 'proper' fix.
>
> I'm running this on a Intel box (Pentium II Dell server), running Linux
> (RedHat 5.2). I installed the majordomo-1.94.4-6 RPM from a mirror of
> the RedHat contrib directory. The majordomo config-test says everything
> is configured properly. I am using perl5:
>
> This is perl, version 5.004_04 built for i386-linux
> (with 1 registered patch, see perl -V for more detail)
>
> As included in the RedHat 5.2 distribution.
>
AH!, there's the rub! Did you mention that in your first post? As has
been reported on this list many times, the perl RPM included with RH5.2 is
a maintenance pre-release, not a stable release of perl. Replace it with
either the perl RPM from the RH5.1 distribution, or get the latest
official release from the perl site www.perl.com and compile it yourself.
Majordomo runs well as distributed on either of these versions of perl.
--
Rick Green
Please note my new address: <rtg@mich.com>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Microsoft has just announced it is renaming Windows NT version 5 to
"Windows 2000."
Is that the ultimate millennium bug or what?
References:
|
|
