>>>>> "r" == richard <richard@charm.net> writes:
r> When scanning for taboo headers, I'm assuming that each regexp is
r> applied to each header individually, and not to the entire block of
r> headers at once.
That is correct.
r> Let's say you don't want richard posting on Saturdays, you can't 'taboo'
r> something like the following, in pseudocode ...
r> "From:" ... "richard" AND "Date:" ... "Sat"
Nope. You can achieve that in the development version, although it isn't
quite as simple to write. (That Date: match also isn't guaranteed to
match. If someone wants date-based access control like that I'll be happy
to add it if that someone is willing to test it.)
r> The taboo filters are resolved 1 header line at a time. Subject: is
r> handled like any other header line.
Yes.
r> Have multi-part's been an issue here, especially regarding WORD files,
r> HTML etc bloating your digests?
Only as far as people asking what to put in taboo_headers to block them.
The development version automatically strips attachments (except
message/rfc822 attachments) from the text digest.
r> 3. Any rumors afloat of significant 2.x updates of Mojo in the works?
No rumors, but a fully working system in alpha test with greatly expanded
functionality. See http://www.hpc.uh.edu/majordomo/.
- J<
References:
|
|
