Majordomo-Users: Re: Digest numbering question.

Majordomo-Users
(September 1999)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: Digest numbering question.
From:	Omar Thameen <omar @ clifford . inch . com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 1999 01:31:54 -0400
To:	Frederic Breitwieser <Frederic @ xephic . dynip . com>, "'majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com'" <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to:	<91235B32642FD311A0A40020AFD702DC027AA2@prod1.xephic.dynip.com>; from Frederic Breitwieser on Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:26:21AM -0400
References:	<91235B32642FD311A0A40020AFD702DC027AA2@prod1.xephic.dynip.com>

On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 09:26:21AM -0400, Frederic Breitwieser wrote:
> 
> I've noticed across several days, the digests do in fact number
> correctly, however they are all Volume 01.  Anyone know what the volume
> number is based on?  Is it by year, month, decade?

The digest man page (~majordomo/man/man1/digest.1) states:

NOTES
       The  volume  number does not change automatically; it must
       be incremented manually.

Omar

References:

Digest numbering question.
From: Frederic Breitwieser <Frederic@xephic.dynip.com>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Suspension of list operation From: Lisa Bohm <LBohm@virtual-solutions.net>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: subscribing a user to a list off a web page... From: Omar Thameen <omar@clifford.inch.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Digest numbering question. From: Frederic Breitwieser <Frederic@xephic.dynip.com>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Operating System Error From: Nate Bowers <nateb@lamina.net>