Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(November 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: sendmail 8.9.3 with FreeBSD
From: Vincent Poy <vince @ victor . MCESTATE . COM>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:20:50 -0800 (PST)
To: Mats Dufberg <Mats . Dufberg @ abc . se>
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9911011619080.15674-100000@atle>

On Mon, 1 Nov 1999, Mats Dufberg wrote:

> On Sun, 31 Oct 1999, Vincent Poy wrote:
> 
> > fwong: "|/usr/local/majordomo/wrapper resend -l fwong -h mail.GAIANET.NET fwong-outgoing"
> > fwong-outgoing::include:/usr/local/majordomo/lists/fwong
> (...)
> > 	I'll do a test now to both fwong@mail.GAIANET.NET which uses
> > majordomo and then fwong-outgoing@mail.GAIANET.NET which should bypass
> > majordomo altogether.
> > 
> > 	The test to fwong-outgoing@mail.GAIANET.NET seems to work
> > correctly as it generates only one copy of the message.
> (...)
> > 	fwong@mail.GAIANET.NET seems to generate 4 copies or rather 4
> > sendmail queues when it's supposed to be one as follows:
> 
> Your finding is supported by the headers in the four copies:
> 
> Here majordomo delivers the message to sendmail:
>   Received: (from majordom@localhost)
>         by earth.GAIANET.NET (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA24019
>         for fwong-outgoing; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 13:48:32 -0800 (PST)
>                                              ^^^^^^^^
>         (envelope-from owner-fwong@earth.GAIANET.NET)
> 
> The marked time stamp is different in the four copies.
> 
> 
> Here is just before sendmail delivers it to majordomo:
>   Received: from victor.MCESTATE.COM (vince@victor.MCESTATE.COM
>         [207.211.200.31])
>         by earth.GAIANET.NET (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24012
>         for <fwong@earth.GAIANET.NET>; Sun, 31 Oct 1999 13:48:30 -0800
>                                                         ^^^^^^^^
>         (PST)
>         (envelope-from vince@victor.MCESTATE.COM)
> 
> The marked time stamp is the same for all copies.
> 
> Is resend called four times or does resend call sendmail four times? I
> don't remember if you can increase logging so that each time resend is
> called there is a log entry. Otherwise you could easily add temporary
> logging to some file at the start of resend.

	Actually, resend only calls sendmail once.  It seems like someone
else mentioned that if the sendmail queue is setup too short, then it will 
tail the queue and resend the same queue again?  I had it at -q1m and
changed it to -q30m but what's a optimal setting without the problems?


Cheers,
Vince - vince@MCESTATE.COM - vince@GAIANET.NET           ________   __ ____ 
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
GaiaNet Corporation - M & C Estate                     / / / /  | /  | __] ]  
Beverly Hills, California USA 90210                   / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____]




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: ownership issues
From: Neil <neil@pacifier.com>
Next: Re: sendmail 8.9.3 with FreeBSD
From: Vincent Poy <vince@victor.MCESTATE.COM>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: sendmail 8.9.3 with FreeBSD
From: Mats Dufberg <Mats.Dufberg@abc.se>
Next: Re: sendmail 8.9.3 with FreeBSD
From: Mats Dufberg <Mats.Dufberg@abc.se>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com