Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(November 1999)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: The which @ issue
From: Mikko Hänninen <Mikko . Hanninen @ dna . fi>
Organization: None
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 1999 15:42:46 +0200
To: Majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911041918020.3464-100000@mail.woodvale.on.ca>; from idouglas@woodvale.on.ca on Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 07:19:12PM -0500
Mail-followup-to: Majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
References: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9911041517450.3326-100000@listserv.nses.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911041918020.3464-100000@mail.woodvale.on.ca>
Reply-to: Mikko . Hanninen @ iki . fi

Ian Douglas <idouglas@woodvale.on.ca> wrote on Thu, 04 Nov 1999:
> Heheh. I did a "which @" on a server I have access to and caught 75,000 Email
> addresses in a 3.5MB file. Yikes!
> 
> They're plugging the hole "as we speak".

So does anyone have a patch against majordomo 1.94.4 to stop this?
Or is the "right way" to just set no_advertise for all lists?


Mikko
-- 
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu  //  wiz@iki.fi  //  http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer  //   net.freak  //   DALnet IRC operator /
// Interests: roleplaying, Linux, the Net, fantasy & scifi, the Corrs /
Bugs come in through open Windows.


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Majordomo + Aliases + Sendmail = doubts !
From: "Greg W" <greg@ausit.com>
Next: Re: "which @" not exposing all addresses (sendmail 8.8.5,
From: Kevin Merrill <kmerrill@listserv.nses.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: The which @ issue
From: Ian Douglas <idouglas@woodvale.on.ca>
Next: Re: The which @ issue
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@QueerNet.ORG>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com