Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(May 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: "bounce" alert elimination available?
From: "Michael K. Heney" <mheney @ mach-25 . com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 10:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: Hallvard Tangeraas <hall @ oslo . online . no>
Cc: "(list) Majordomo-users" <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>
In-reply-to: <l03130300b55741b7162f@[193.217.213.129]>


Joe Ah posted a patch location to the list last week - here's his 
message...

-----

Here's the patch for 1.94.4, but it should easily apply to 1.94.5 too:

        ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-patches/1.94.4/resend.7

Regards,

Joe
-- 
     _/   _/_/_/       _/              ____________    __o
     _/   _/   _/      _/         ______________     _-\<,_
 _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                     ......(_)/ (_)
  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah        jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us


On Mon, 29 May 2000, Hallvard Tangeraas wrote:

> I've been running a Majordomo list for a couple of years now, but the
> provider is closing down its services and I've had to ask a friend if
> he could let me use his server for a new list.
> 
> He knows a lot about UNIX, programming and that sort of stuff has set
> up a new list which is working fine.
> I've spent the past few days configuring the "config", "intro" and
> "info" files as well as testing it.
> 
> As he doesn't know much about Majordomo, and I don't know much about
> the technical stuff we try to complement each other's knowledge, so
> basically I'm trying to find the information needed, and he does the
> installments/configurations at the server.....
> I've got a fair bit of knowledge about the stuff you do via email
> concerning the files mentioned above.
> 
> 
> The version of Majordomo I'm now using with the new server is 1.94.5
> which I understand is the latest one, right?
> 
> Any patches or fixes I should have my friend install? Any extra
> features which could come in handy with additional patches?
> 
> What I really want to know is about the "bounce" problem.
> Now and then members with multiple accounts forget that they can only
> post from the same account as they've subscribed from.
> 
> I've already set up the following parameters to make it as secure as possible:
> 
> get_access          =   list
> intro_access        =   list
> restrict_post       =   notator
> subscribe_policy    =   open+confirm
> unsubscribe_policy  =   open+confirm
> which_access        =   list
> who_access          =   list
> 
> Now, as far as I can tell this should eliminate just about all
> problems, alerting the sender that he/she can't access those commands
> because they're non-members, and that if subscribing/unsubscribing, the
> person in question is contacted (in case the non-subscribed address is
> used when sending the command) and so on.
> 
> The only exception is when a non-member (i.e. a member using another
> account) posts a message to the list.
> In this case, I, as the list-owner get a "bounce" message.
> What good does this do? It only causes me more work as I have to
> contact the sender about this.
> Why not alert the sender as with those commands which are only
> restricted to list members?
> 
> I believe there is a patch or a solution for this, but I couldn't find
> any looking through older messages.
> 
> Hallvard
> --
> Hyperlink Launchpad: <http://also.as/hall/>
> Atari Launchpad    : <http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Bay/8745/>
> Notator/Creator SL : <http://www.crosswinds.net/~notator/>
> 
> 



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: "bounce" alert elimination available?
From: Hallvard Tangeraas <hall@oslo.online.no>
Next: Odd digest problem - one per msg
From: Joe Hartley <jh@brainiac.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: "bounce" alert elimination available?
From: Hallvard Tangeraas <hall@oslo.online.no>
Next: Re: "bounce" alert elimination available?
From: Dan Liston <dliston@netscape.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com