Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(May 2000)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Multiple [my-list] marks
From: Dan Liston <dliston @ netscape . com>
Organization: iPlanet E-Commerce Solutions, A Sun-Netscape Alliance
Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 16:34:06 -0500
To: Jacek <jacek @ oi . idl . krakow . pl>
Cc: majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005311814220.20474-100000@oi.idl.krakow.pl>

I did not think any mail clients still prepended additional Re: to the
subject if there was already one there.  I guess I have not been paying
close enough attention.  You could always trap this with taboo_headers.
/\[my-list\].*\[my-list\]/i
/Re: *Re:/i

If you are going to start patching majordomo's resend to fix
subject_prefix,
could you also look at the bug with blank/missing subject headers?  If
the
subject_prefix setting is used, but there is no subject to begin with, I
believe there is a problem as well.

Dan Liston

Jacek wrote:
> 
> Is there any way I can filter subjects of the messages sent to the list so
> that I get rid of multiple "[my-list]" marks and "Re: Re: Re:" ocurrences
> in subject line?
> I simply want to avoid messages with subjects such as: "[my-list]
> Re: Re: [my-list] SomeTopic" etc.
> Has anyone already come through this problem or do I have to append some
> perl lines to original files?
> 
> --
> 
> Jacek Juda, Wydawnictwo Medycyna Praktyczna


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: taboo_ stuff not working
From: Dan Liston <dliston@netscape.com>
Next: Re: This might be stupid but...
From: mjn <mjn@tc.umn.edu>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Multiple [my-list] marks
From: Jacek <jacek@oi.idl.krakow.pl>
Next: Re: Multiple [my-list] marks
From: Mikko Hänninen <Mikko.Hanninen@dna.fi>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com