At 7:43 AM -0700 10/26/00, Dan Liston wrote:
>Jason Witherspoon wrote:
>>
>> At 9:16 AM -0700 10/25/00, Todd Lyons wrote:
>> >If you look in the sendmail FAQ, there's a section that basically says
>> >the Majordomo FAQ is wrong:
>> >
>> > http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.32
>> >and the next section explains why:
>> > http://www.sendmail.org/faq/section3.html#3.33
>> >-
>>
>> Pardon my presumptuousness here, but perhaps someone should change
>> the Majordomo FAQ? About 70% of the discussion here seems to be
>> related to difficulties caused by it's misinformation about
>> preferences--
>> --
>
>I think you mean permissions where you said preferences, but
>either way, majordomo will run with the permissions listed in the
>FAQ (IF your sendmail is old, OR you disable some/most of sendmail
>security). The key to majordomo is understanding sendmail. Just
>another reference for situational awareness.
Yup, I meant permissions--
>
>A section should be appended to the FAQ to cover the newer sendmail
>security issues, but 70% of the discussions here did not start with
>people reading the FAQ anyway. :(
>
>Dan Liston
Well, I *did* go step by step through the FAQ, & saw a bunch of other
people asking the same questions I had, so I'll heartily second the
first part of that last sentence of yours--
--
Jason Witherspoon
ICQ #62837760
---------
----O----
--- ---
--- ---
----O----
---------
com/~arz
http://www.best.com/~arzachel
www.best.com/~arzachel
best.com/~a
References:
|
|
