Re: smrsh

[Dan Liston <dliston @ netscape . com>]

Wrapper not available...  is an smrsh issue.  I am not sure about RH 6.1 any more, but in 
6.2 with sendmail 8.9.3 and majordomo 1.94.5, this is what information I have (that works);

[sendmail.cf]
O AliasFile=/etc/aliases, /etc/mail/majordomo.aliases
Tmajordomo
Mprocmail,      P=/usr/bin/procmail, F=DFMSPhnu9, S=11/31, R=21/31, T=DNS/RFC822/X-Unix,
                A=procmail -Y -m $h $f $u

Mprog,          P=/usr/sbin/smrsh, F=lsDFMoqeu9, S=10/30, R=20/40, D=$z:/,
                T=X-Unix,
                A=sh -c $u

`ll /usr/sbin/smrsh`
-r-xr-xr-x    1 root     root         4592 Feb 17  2000 /usr/sbin/smrsh

`ll /etc/smrsh`
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           26 Nov  3 02:18 bulk_mailer -> ../../usr/sbin/bulk_mailer
lrwxrwxrwx    1 root     root           31 Nov  2 18:06 wrapper -> ../../usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper

[/etc/passwd]
majordomo:x:91:91:Majordomo List Manager:/usr/lib/majordomo:/bin/bash

[/etc/aliases]
majordomo: "|/usr/lib/majordomo/wrapper majordomo"
majordomo-owner: owner-majordomo
owner-majordomo: dliston,

Did you install sendmail 8.11.1 from an rpm package, or compile it yourself?

Dan Liston

Ray Goniea wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am wondering if anyone has figured out the smrsh problem?
> 
> We are running RH 6.1, Sendmail 8.11.1 compiled with the cyrus-sasl libraries for
> authentication with Majordomo 1.9.4.5 and despite our best efforts and days of trying have
> not been able to use the smrsh line in the sendmail.cf file. Yes we have been through the
> FAQ's and 2 years worth of this mailing list archives. Yes we have added the symbolic link
> to the wrapper in the /etc/smrsh folder.
> 
> We have setup the aliases file by hand, using a 3rd party program using templates, and
> webmin. None of the above three ways work when using the smrsh line in the sendmail.cf
> file. The only way is to lax the security and use /bin/sh. Then everything works.
> 
> The error by the way is "smrsh: wrapper not available for sendmail programs"
> 
> While everything is working just fine using the /bin/sh line we would prefer having the
> security as tight as possible, but the MLM needs to be up and ready the first of the year,
> and this seems to be our only option.
> 
> Thanks for any ideas you might have.
> 
> Ray