hi ya...
isn't this the same/similar reasons as why vi is
better/worst than emacs...
why linux is better/worst than microsoft...
- think its a preference issue...
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://www.google.com/search?q=considered+harmful
have fun
alvin
> Tim O'Neil wrote:
>
> At 06:58 PM 3/22/2001, you wrote:
> >Tim O'Neil wrote:
> > >
> > > How does one set replies to a list rather
> > > than the individual poster of that list?
> >
> >This is a HIGHLY DISCOURAGED practice, but
> >it can be done be setting the reply_to =
> >of your listname.conf file to $LIST
>
> Yes, I saw remarks to the same in the list archives,
> the reason given was a link to an rfc that didn't
> make much sense to me. As for putting a $LIST tag
> in that field that was the first thing I did, and it
> didn't seem to work, so I put the literal name of the
> field in there and that did it. Would anyone care to
> briefly say in their own words why setting the reply
> to the list is not a good idea?
>
>
References:
|
|
