Sorry, the "reason" for suggesting eudora is because outlook and netscape
"can't" do it. What they "are" capable of though, is plain text email.
If the client is using plain text, the headers can also be tricked in.
If you what custom headers AND rich text HTML messages, get eudora.
Dan Liston
Adam Brooks wrote:
>
> Ahhh, but my client uses Outlook? Any ideas on how to do that with Outlook?
> I haven't found it.
>
> - Adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> [mailto:majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of Stephen Chin
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:47 PM
> To: 'James'; majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
> Subject: RE: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer
>
> Sure, I agree. We put it in the header of Eudora and is fine...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> [mailto:majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of James
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:53 AM
> To: majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
> Subject: Re: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer
>
> Thus spake Adam Brooks (Adam@ATonline.com):
>
> > I know that HTML messages can go out viw MD. The problem appears to be
> that
> > using the approval header and trying to support html doesn't work
> together.
>
> I'm willing to bet his client is not putting the approval header in the
> headers of the email, but in the body instead.
>
> --
> James <oneiros@darkspire.net> 1024D/62C2F77D
> uri: http://oneiros.darkspire.net/ EBB8 AF14 8C43 2F12 7623
> irc: EFnet / opn / tietNET C0AA C0AE 56D4 62C2 F77D
References:
|
|
