Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(October 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: RE: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer
From: "Jamie Booth" <jamie @ webkor . com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 04:06:12 -0400
To: "Daniel Liston" <dliston @ netscape . com>, <adam @ atonline . com>
Cc: <majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3BB7E91B.65D66139@netscape.com>
Reply-to: <jamie @ webkor . com>

I understand, have checked it out, and I thank you, Dan.
I guess the less informed (yours truly), thought that the
common MS or NS were capable of just about anything.

Ive been LQQKING for a way to manipulate the headers in Out
look for quite a few days...    Eudora looks very nice   =)

p.s. - humorous interpretations:
       MS - micro soft
       NS - notso soft

-----Original Message-----
From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
[mailto:majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of Daniel Liston
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2001 11:55 PM
To: adam@atonline.com
Cc: stephenchin@sportsreal.com; 'James'; majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
Subject: Re: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer


Sorry, the "reason" for suggesting eudora is because outlook and netscape
"can't" do it.  What they "are" capable of though, is plain text email.
If the client is using plain text, the headers can also be tricked in.
If you what custom headers AND rich text HTML messages, get eudora.

Dan Liston

Adam Brooks wrote:
>
> Ahhh, but my client uses Outlook? Any ideas on how to do that with
Outlook?
> I haven't found it.
>
> - Adam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> [mailto:majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of Stephen Chin
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 9:47 PM
> To: 'James'; majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
> Subject: RE: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer
>
> Sure, I agree. We put it in the header of Eudora and is fine...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM
> [mailto:majordomo-users-owner@GreatCircle.COM]On Behalf Of James
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 5:53 AM
> To: majordomo-users@GreatCircle.COM
> Subject: Re: HTML Emails - Am Willing To Pay For An Answer
>
> Thus spake Adam Brooks (Adam@ATonline.com):
>
> > I know that HTML messages can go out viw MD. The problem appears to be
> that
> > using the approval header and trying to support html doesn't work
> together.
>
> I'm willing to bet his client is not putting the approval header in the
> headers of the email, but in the body instead.
>
> --
>  James <oneiros@darkspire.net>      1024D/62C2F77D
>  uri: http://oneiros.darkspire.net/ EBB8 AF14 8C43 2F12 7623
>  irc: EFnet / opn / tietNET         C0AA C0AE 56D4 62C2 F77D





Indexed By Date Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Re: proper syntax for moderated list
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@netscape.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous:
From: (nil)
Next: Re: proper syntax for moderated list
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@netscape.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com