Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(December 2001)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Bulk Mailer still required?
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 00:22:44 -0800
To: dliston @ netscape . com (Dan Liston), majordomo-users @ GreatCircle . COM
Cc: Ezra Bick <ebick @ etzion . org . il>
In-reply-to: <3C16D5C6.FB10197D@netscape.com>
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011209151955.039de8c8@gopostal.onlinepolicy.net><5.1.0.14.0.20011211070445.05fb9bb8@gopostal.onlinepolicy.net>

At 09:57 PM 12/11/2001 -0600, Dan Liston wrote:
>15 should be a safe number for AOL, but I do not think they allow more
>than 20 recipients per message.

It's much, much more complex than that.  They allow *some* number of 
messages with more than 20 recipients, and *some* rate of messages with 
even as few as one recipient, and they apply some complicated heuristics to 
decide if you're a spammer based on number of messages in elapsed periods 
with numbers of recipients all fitting in.  Even more, they allow these to 
be exceeded and their boundary MTAs return success, with the spam checks 
applied inside and the messages thrown away silently.

However, I'm not worried for myself, at least in the short run, because we 
went through a messy and semi-public negotiation/protest resulting in my 
site's being whitelisted to deliver to them under limits that would allow 
us to squeak past when others might get filtered.




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Majordomo question
From: dliston@netscape.com (Dan Liston)
Next: WHICH doesn't give any results
From: "Lars H. Korte" <lk@ordix.de>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Bulk Mailer still required?
From: dliston@netscape.com (Dan Liston)
Next: RE: Bulk Mailer still required?
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com