Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(August 2002)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Majordomo mailinglist only plain text?
From: Richard Welty <rwelty @ suespammers . org>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 12:51:34 -0400 (EDT)
To: Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <000b01c23a3b$96ce9e40$0301a8c0@DELL4100>
References: <000b01c23a3b$96ce9e40$0301a8c0@DELL4100>

On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:45:11 +0200 Frans Zijm <syseditor@planet.nl> wrote: 
> I want to use the mailinglist to send binaries.
... 
> But the approval message is plain text and the attachments are embedded
> in
> the message and therefor unuseful.
 
> Is this normal practise?

yes. the attachments should have been mime encoded, and probably converted
to base 64 for transport.

email is a text media, and binaries can't reasonably be transported without
conversion to an intermediate text representation (e.g., base 64).

you should try approving such a message and see if the folks at the other
end can unpack it before you panic. 

richard
--
Richard Welty
rwelty@suespammers.org                                 Averill Park Networking
rwelty@averillpark.net           Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
rwelty@krusty-motorsports.com                                     518-573-7592




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Is it possible to keep html-content in mails?
From: "Lundberg, Bruce" <BLundberg@jonesknowledge.com>
Next: AOL 7.0 plain text wrapup
From: Jay O'Brien <jayobrien@att.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Majordomo mailinglist only plain text?
From: "Frans Zijm" <syseditor@planet.nl>
Next: AOL 7.0 plain text wrapup
From: Jay O'Brien <jayobrien@att.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com