Majordomo-Users: Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).

Majordomo-Users
(August 2002)

Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject:	Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).
From:	"Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:33:08 -0700
To:	Daniel Liston <dliston @ sonny . org>
Cc:	Ian Mortimer <ian @ physics . uq . edu . au>,majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
References:	<200208160001.g7G01Eg32149@ian.physics.uq.edu.au> <3D5C578C.953E16FA@sonny.org>
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020727

Daniel Liston wrote:

>There are still advantages to using bulk_mailer though.
>It offers the ability to split your distribution lists into bite
>size pieces which make it easier for sendmail to deal with, and for
>certain domains (AOL for example) to only get X number of recipients
>per message or per connection.
>  
>

...as does Sendmail 8.12.

Follow-Ups:

Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).
From: Ezra Bick <ebick@etzion.org.il>

References:

bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).
From: Ian Mortimer <ian@physics.uq.edu.au>
Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers).
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>

Indexed By Date	Previous:	Re: Digests and the RaQ4 From: "BubblyBabs" <bubblybabs@gmx.net>
Indexed By Date	Next:	Re: Using a second list as a nomail function From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Indexed By Thread	Previous:	Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers). From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Indexed By Thread	Next:	Re: bulk_mailer (and precedence headers). From: Ezra Bick <ebick@etzion.org.il>