Re: HTML

[Daniel Liston <dliston @ sonny . org>]

These should be good indicators of html email, but be warned that they
could catch more than you want to deal with.  In fact, this message
itself would have been caught if these filters were in place.

taboo_headers <<END
/Content-Type:.*html/i
/Content-Type:.*alternative/i
END

taboo_body <<END
/Content-Type:.*html/i
/\/html/i
/\/body/i
/color="#/i
/\/font/i
END

Dan Liston

Wouter van der Velde wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> sorry for not quoting, my webmailer does support indents for replying.
> Unfortunately I have no access to the majordomo config files, as my ISP
> restricted that.
> 
> I have configged the taboo header, I will consider using demime, if I cannot
> handle the few html-posts by hand.
> 
> Thank you for your help!
> 
> Wouter
> 
> PS if anyone has any suggestions what headers I should add to the taboo
> headers, feel free to email me!
> 
> 
> 
>  >what should I enter at taboo headers when I want to ban html-posts to
> my
> 
>>mailinglist?
> 
> 
>     I've used:
> 
> /DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC/
> 
> 
> I agree, however, with Richard Welty when he said DeMime is better.
> 
> ...Bob