Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(February 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: HTML
From: Daniel Liston <dliston @ sonny . org>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 03:43:43 -0600
To: Wouter van der Velde <Wouter . vanderVelde @ wkap . nl>
Cc: "''majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com' '" <majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com>
References: <6DFAA8CF01F3E243BE4D137CBF7E4F4F04866AAF@id192.wkap.nl>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01

Yes, because the body taboo would catch "/html" using the
examples I sent from within the body of that email.

Dan Liston

Wouter van der Velde wrote:
>>These should be good indicators of html email, but be warned 
>>that they could catch more than you want to deal with.  In 
>>fact, this message itself would have been caught if these 
>>filters were in place.
> 
> 
> [snip taboo headers / body]
> 
> Thanks for the tips, I will include them and try.
> 
> You say this very email would have been caught too, that's because you have
> the words html are in the body?
> I cannot find any of the headers you mentioned in the email I received:
> 



References:
  • Re: HTML
    From: Wouter van der Velde <Wouter.vanderVelde@wkap.nl>
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: HTML
From: Wouter van der Velde <Wouter.vanderVelde@wkap.nl>
Next: Re: Daniel Liston - tasting one two three
From: "Litiatco, Rick" <Rick.Litiatco@disney.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: HTML
From: Wouter van der Velde <Wouter.vanderVelde@wkap.nl>
Next: Re: restricted posts and x400 [problem solved]
From: Ralph Manak <rmanak@mindspring.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com