Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(February 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: approving attachments
From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo @ syslang . net>
Organization: SysLang Inc.
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:59:42 -0500 (EST)
To: spydrman <spydrman @ jacksonesd . k12 . or . us>
Cc: "majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com" <majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <3E540B5E.1B85BFAD@jacksonesd.k12.or.us>

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, spydrman wrote:

=>Hi all,
=>
=>We are having trouble approving emails that have attachments (word.doc).
=>Following the approval instructions, we remove the necessary lines at the top
=>of the message, approve with password, and send the email with the encoded
=>attachment (looks like garbage) back to the list. The list members receive the
=>encoded garbage, and the attachment is no longer seen as the appropriate mime
=>type and decoded. Any ideas?
=>
=>Thanks.
Have you tried using the approve command that come with majordomo? It 
works every time.

-- 
-Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have -
-happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
-Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
-individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: approving attachments
From: spydrman <spydrman@jacksonesd.k12.or.us>
Next: Re: automate the creation process in majorcool
From: "Ken Bedell" <kbedell@dnaco.net>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: approving attachments
From: spydrman <spydrman@jacksonesd.k12.or.us>
Next: Re: approving attachments
From: webmaster <webmaster@soesd.k12.or.us>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com