Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(September 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Installing Majordomo
From: Daniel Liston <dliston @ sonny . org>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 02:08:46 -0500
To: Majordomo Users <majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <01bc01c37ef0$8c41f710$6700a8c0@STUDY>
References: <78C662A57529A14FAD49FC8819F5E2D40BCEADBC@swan.bcsc.gov.bc.ca> <00ea01c37e3d$ce73db70$6700a8c0@STUDY> <3F6A46AF.1090209@sonny.org> <003c01c37e45$8b264490$6700a8c0@STUDY> <3F6A6907.1060304@sonny.org> <00b501c37ec2$c6f53620$6700a8c0@STUDY> <3F6B25B8.6000104@sonny.org> <01bc01c37ef0$8c41f710$6700a8c0@STUDY>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030917

I think tomcat is related to apache, but since I do not run
web services, I can not state anything authoritively in this
area.  You have to understand the needs or tomcat at this
point in order to use the majordomo RPM file.  My apologies,
as you may now be stuck with using the gzipped tarball to
install majordomo.

Dan Liston

Billy Hamm wrote:
> Here's what I got. Seems 'tomcat' was installed at 91.
> It must have been in the RHLx9 package. I didn't see it.
> 
> [root@sm1249 root]# grep 91 /etc/group /etc/passwd
> /etc/group:tomcat4:x:91:
> /etc/passwd:tomcat4:x:91:91:Tomcat4:/var/tomcat4:/bin/bash
> 
> Billy
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Daniel Liston" <dliston@sonny.org>
> To: "Majordomo Users" <majordomo-users@greatcircle.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 9:50 AM
> Subject: Re: Installing Majordomo
> 
> 
> 
>>grep 91 /etc/group /etc/passwd
>>and what do you get?  Maybe majordomo has been installed on this box
>>before.  I have not seen anything else that tries to use these numbers.
>>Make sure all remnants of previous attempts to install majordomo are
>>removed before using the RPM installer.  You might also try installing
>>with different flags to the rpm command, like -Uhv or -Fhv instead of
>>-ihv.  The ihv does an install, with "hash" progress marks and verbose
>>messages.  Uhv does the same, but "updates" any existing majordomo that
>>is installed, and Fhv forces the install.  Please do not use Fhv until
>>you know what user and group 91 are, and why the rpm could not find
>>the /etc/aliases file.  If the 91 is in fact majordomo, you just have
>>to make use of the existing structure to use it, or use the Uhv flags
>>to rpm to safely guarantee all the pieces are in place.
>>
>>
>>Dan Liston
>>
>>
>>Billy Hamm wrote:
>>
>>>Here is the response I got:
>>>
>>>[root@sm1249 cgi-bin]# rpm -ihv majordomo-1.94.5-2.i386.rpm
>>>warning: majordomo-1.94.5-2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
>>>db42a60e
>>>Preparing...                ###########################################
>>>[100%]
>>>groupadd: gid 91 is not unique
>>>useradd: uid 91 is not unique
>>>usermod: unknown group majordomo
>>>cp: cannot stat `/etc/aliases': No such file or directory
>>>/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.43452: line 6: newaliases: command not found
>>>error: %pre(majordomo-1.94.5-2) scriptlet failed, exit status 127
>>>error:   install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping majordomo-1.94.5-2
>>>
>>>Any suggestions?
>>>Billy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 




References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Majordomo messages to hotmail users
From: "Peter P. Benac" <ppbenac@emacolet.com>
Next: Fw: Installing Majordomo
From: "Billy Hamm" <brhamm@masterpub.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Installing Majordomo
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Next: Re: Precedence and Sender showing up in message body
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com