Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(September 2003)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: infinite loop message
From: "S. Barnes" <s . barnes @ uni-koeln . de>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 01:31:42 +0200
To: Rob Reilly <reilly @ media . mit . edu>
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.4.40.0309241246300.11157-100000@ml.media.mit.edu>


On Wednesday, Sep 24, 2003, at 18:53 Europe/Berlin, Rob Reilly wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I can't use the term-of-art that applies here as the Majordomo filter
> seems to trash those messages.
>
> I am concerned about the potential where someone is not at work to 
> receive
> their email for a few day/weeks and they set their email config to send
> out a message letting everyone know that they are "Out....".

Majordomo uses LISTNAME-owner as sender adress and keeps the original 
To:
Unless you set a Reply-To Header that points back to your list, Out... 
notices should go to the original poster, not the list.
Good autoresponders should not answer to a mailinglist-mail anyway, but 
there are plenty of broken ones.

Therefore I would just avoid setting
reply_to=
in the list.config file.

> Is there something I can put into the 'config' file to help avert an
> infinite loop caused by "Out..." messages? Any other thoughts in this
> regard?

You could try to filter using taboo headers or body, however 
autoresponders can send pretty much whatever their 
user/admin/programmer wants. There is no magic vacation-header or 
something like that.

Regards,
Sue



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: infinite loop message
From: Rob Reilly <reilly@media.mit.edu>
Next: Sendmail NOQUEUE failure?
From: Michael Craig Amper <ampermc@macbus.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: infinite loop message
From: Rob Reilly <reilly@media.mit.edu>
Next: Re: infinite loop message
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com