Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: security hole
From: "MajorDomo Administrator, MSER:EX" <Majordomo . Admin @ gems1 . gov . bc . ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 14:06:24 -0800
To: "'Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com'" <Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com>

We noticed a bad security hole with our majordomo lists.  It was brought to
our attention by the list subscribers who were getting spoofed virus
rejections.  The rejections were going to the listname-outgoing address and
therefore bypassing the requirement for moderation.

Has anyone else had this problem and how did they patch it?

a template of aliases file config

owner-l_tk_testlist: l_tk_testlist-owner
l_tk_testlist: "|/home/majordomo/wrapper resend -l l_tk_testlist -h
listsserver.ca -f l_tk_testlist-owner l_tk_testlist-outgoing"
l_tk_testlist-owner: me@myaddress
l_tk_testlist-approval: l_tk_testlist-owner
owner-l_tk_testlist-approval: l_tk_testlist-owner
l_tk_testlist-outgoing: :include:/home/majordomo/lists/l_tk_testlist
owner-l_tk_testlist-outgoing: l_tk_testlist-owner

Thanks,
Majordomo Support   
mailto:Majordomo.Admin@gems1.gov.bc.ca



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Controlling the max message size for a list
From: Greg Dec <gmdec@naz.edu>
Next: Re: security hole
From: John Sechrest <sechrest@peak.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Controlling the max message size for a list
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Next: Re: security hole
From: John Sechrest <sechrest@peak.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com