Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Wholesale blacklisting by AHBL
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:23:43 -0800
To: davislee @ btinternet . com
Cc: major <majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com>
In-reply-to: <20040331232212.34018.qmail@web60202.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20040331232212.34018.qmail@web60202.mail.yahoo.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040219)

Lee wrote:
> 1)  Write (via recorded 'snail mail') to the MD of each ISP who you know 
> is blocking you, and say you demand a change in policy or you will seek 
> compensation from them and initiate a legal challenge.

He has no standing to pursue a legal challenge.  He has no right to 
deliver mail to a server.  The issue is whether he has a contractual 
obligation to his users to accept mail sent by Ed's server -- only those 
users have any standing.

> 2)  If you strongly believe the 'spam detection group' is being paid by 
> the ISP's, you should contact your local Trading Standards and the police.

He didn't really say anything that implies that.  What do you mean, 
"the" ISPs?  He's acting as one too.

>     This misguided "service" to ISP customers is actually a serious
>     disservice,
>     but how to stop it?

Lots of people's users think it *is* a service.

Once again: nobody has any obligation to Ed to accept mail he sends. 
They may or may not have an obligation to their users to accept mail 
they wish to receive.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Wholesale blacklisting by AHBL
From: Lee <lee_19712003@yahoo.com>
Next: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: Alvin Oga <alvin@Planet.fef.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Wholesale blacklisting by AHBL
From: Lee <lee_19712003@yahoo.com>
Next: Re: security hole (not)
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com