Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: Alvin Oga <alvin @ Planet . fef . com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:13:38 -0800 (PST)
To: rogerk @ queernet . org (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Cc: Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <406B8823.70708@queernet.org> from "Roger B.A. Klorese" at Mar 31, 2004 07:10:27 PM


hi ya

> Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> 
> Alvin Oga wrote:
> > if you reject the original spam  ... the spammers mta machine
> > will fill up with bounced messages .. they will have to clean their
> > /var/spool/{clientqueue/mqueue/mail} directories
> 
> Um, what makes you think they use sendmail, or any other standard MTA, 
> to spam with?  Typically they use a specialized list-driven parallelized 
> SMTP engine that doesn't bother with a queue.

yup... if they use their own specialized hw and if oyu looked at
where the spam came from, you'd know if they use their own hw
or if they are using some un-suspecting bozo's machine on the wire
 
and, guess you're missing the point.. if they use other peoples boxes
to spam from, that uses standard sendmail/postfix/exim, etc...
than the bounces will fill up their que

either way ... i dont care ... the spam gets bounced

c ya
alvin



Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Next: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Next: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com