Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk @ queernet . org>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 19:20:03 -0800
To: Alvin Oga <alvin @ Planet . fef . com>
Cc: Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <200404010313.i313DcLK024136@Planet.fef.com>
References: <200404010313.i313DcLK024136@Planet.fef.com>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040219)

Alvin Oga wrote:
> and, guess you're missing the point.. if they use other peoples boxes
> to spam from, that uses standard sendmail/postfix/exim, etc...
> than the bounces will fill up their que

Yes, but it's rude to fill Unsuspecting Bozo's queue if you reject it, 
or the forged sender's if you bounce it.


Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: Alvin Oga <alvin@Planet.fef.com>
Next: Re: security hole (not) - bounces - law
From: Alvin Oga <alvin@Planet.fef.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: Alvin Oga <alvin@Planet.fef.com>
Next: Re: security hole (not) - bounces - law
From: Alvin Oga <alvin@Planet.fef.com>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com