Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: security hole (not) - bounces - law
From: Alvin Oga <alvin @ Planet . fef . com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:05:55 -0800 (PST)
To: rogerk @ queernet . org (Roger B.A. Klorese)
Cc: Majordomo-Users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <406B8A63.1010202@queernet.org> from "Roger B.A. Klorese" at Mar 31, 2004 07:20:03 PM


hi ya roger

> Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
> 
> Alvin Oga wrote:
> > and, guess you're missing the point.. if they use other peoples boxes
> > to spam from, that uses standard sendmail/postfix/exim, etc...
> > than the bounces will fill up their que
> 
> Yes, but it's rude to fill Unsuspecting Bozo's queue if you reject it, 
> or the forged sender's if you bounce it.
 
yes... but its against the law to send spam

its not against the law to bounce spam we do NOT want to get

and since in todays world, everybody has the ability to have
their own cray-mp on their desktop, but dont know how to use it,
its their problem if they dont know how to maintain their PCs

	( they take their cars to the car-mechanic or they can fix the
	  car themself

	( they should take their pc to the pc-mechanic but they
	  ignore the problem and things just gets worst for others

	and everybody should have a "i own a pc license"
	and insurance :-)

c ya
alvin



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Next:
From: (nil)
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: security hole (not) - bounces
From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" <rogerk@queernet.org>
Next: Re: security hole
From: Nicholas Anderson <nicholas@fiocruz.br>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com