On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:32:08PM +0200, mp@gtt-technologies.de wrote:
Hi,
> > But this is a problem of a clueless configured virus scanner on the
> > remote side.
> > First, it makes no sense to send a warning out to the "sender", since
> > the "sender" is faked in almost all cases.
> This is only the case in recent times.
We /do/ have recent times ;-)
> > Second, even /if/ they send a warning, this warning shoud be addressed
> > neither to the From nor to the Reply-To, but to the Sender (which should
> > be somthing like majordomo-owner@listserver)
> This assumes that a mail server application is able to distinguish between
> a "normal" user address and a list server adress. I don't think this is
> the case and I presume it's too difficult to program.
I was wrong. If I understand RfC 821 correctly, error messages must
bounce back to the Envelope-From.
But again: These are usually faked nowadays.
Rainer
--
Stupidity is the basic building block of the universe.
(Frank Zappa)
References:
|
|
