|
Subject: |
Re: Restrict post or not? |
|
From: |
Ed Kasky <ed @
esson .
net> |
|
Date: |
Sun, 03 Oct 2004 12:41:11 -0700 |
|
To: |
cr10 @
compuserve .
com, majordomo-users @
greatcircle .
com |
|
In-reply-to: |
<MHEJLJHDFJAAIPHBALKCMEAOCJAA.cr10@compuserve.com> |
|
References: |
<MHEJLJHDFJAAIPHBALKCMEAOCJAA.cr10@compuserve.com> |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041003 |
Try http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=majordomo-users&r=1&w=2
From January, 2003 - David Newman posted:
>Not everyone thinks this is a good idea. Here are some well-reasoned
>arguments against setting the reply-to parameter:
>
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
Clare Redstone wrote:
>>>Are you sending the approvals to the list or to majordomo?<<
>>>
>>>
>I tried both.
>
>
>
>>>As fo rthe reply_to, I like using the list as the reply_to but it violate
>>>
>>>
>certain email standards. <<
>But you haven't had problems with the auto-responder war?
>
>
>>>If you search the archives of this list, you
>>>
>>>
>will find a link to an article/web page that goes into more detail...<<
>I hunted for this before and couldn't find it. Do you know where it is?
>Thanks for your advice.
>
>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Randomly generated quote:
Anger is a feeling that makes your mouth
work faster than your mind... - Mark Twain
Follow-Ups:
|
|
