Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(October 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Restrict post or not?
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk @ chinet . com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 21:50:42 -0500 (CDT)
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410030814340.15606-100000@yoda2.wrenkasky.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410030814340.15606-100000@yoda2.wrenkasky.com>

At 8:17am -0700, 10/03/04, Ed Kasky <ed@esson.net> wrote:

>As fo rthe reply_to, I like using the list as the reply_to but it violate
>certain email standards.  If you search the archives of this list, you
>will find a link to an article/web page that goes into more detail...

This is the basic argument against setting Reply-To: <list>
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

The basic argument for Reply-To: <list> is that the list is for general
discussion and the list owner expects that most replies are meant for the list
and that (in many email clients) this will continue discussion on the list by
default.


References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Restrict post or not?
From: "Clare Redstone" <cr10@compuserve.com>
Next: Re: Taking care with "reply to" settings
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Restrict post or not?
From: Ed Kasky <ed@esson.net>
Next: Re: Restrict post or not?
From: Ed Kasky <ed@esson.net>

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com