Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(October 2004)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: majorcool and mj_build_aliases
From: Bill Houle <bhoule @ conveyanced . com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:58:41 -0800
To: random @ dxtx . net
Cc: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
In-reply-to: <013601c4bf8f$c47c5e50$0300a8c0@NOISE>
References: <013601c4bf8f$c47c5e50$0300a8c0@NOISE>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)

random@dxtx.net wrote:

> majordomo-owner:        -m
> owner-majordomo:        -m
> owner-owner:            -m
> listmanager:            -m
> corp-pubs:              "/etc/smrsh/wrapper mj_filter"
> #
> # new1 (UNAVAILABLE)
> #
> new1:           "/etc/smrsh/wrapper mj_list-unavail new1"
> new1-request:   "/etc/smrsh/wrapper majordomo -l new1"

I'll answer your question(s) with another question intended to stimulate 
some deductive thought: How does mj_build_aliases know who the owner is 
for each of the different aliases? Those tidbits are not something 
Majordomo normally "knows" about....

For "majordomo-owner" et-al, the info comes from arguments you specify 
on the mj_build command line. I think the fact that "-m" is there 
indicates that you have something amiss in your invocation.

For each individual list-owner, the info is taken from the list.config 
file *after* you have made a modification to the Majordomo source to 
support the "owner" feature. See the Install docs -- of MajorCool, that 
is -- for the specific changes to be made.

--bill



References:
Indexed By Date Previous: majorcool and mj_build_aliases
From: <random@dxtx.net>
Next:
From: (nil)
Indexed By Thread Previous: majorcool and mj_build_aliases
From: <random@dxtx.net>
Next:
From: (nil)

Google
 
Search Internet Search www.greatcircle.com