I just sort of figured you were using sendmail - not sure how you would go
about doing this with Exim...
Ed
~~~~~~~~~
Randomly Generated Quote (16 of 474):
"Always bear in mind that your own resolution to success is more
important than any other one thing." --Abraham Lincoln
At 07:26 AM Wednesday, 3/9/2005, you wrote -=>
>Ed:
>
>Not to sound dumb, but I'm not a procmail guru at all...where and how
>would I implement this? FWIW I'm running Exim 3.36m SpamAssAssin 3.0.2
>and MD 1.94.5
>
>George
>
> >On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:05:21 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
> >I suggest you use a procmail recipe to move the mail to a temporary folder
> >and then monitor that m ail folder to ensure that it is spam. It is
> >never good practice to automatically delete tagged mail until you
> >verify it as no spam software is 100% accurate. Here's one that works
> >for me. Replace /path/to/spam/folder with the correct path for your
> >setup.
> >
> >:0:
> >* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
> >/path/to/spam/folder
> >
> >On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, George R.Kasica wrote:
> >
> >> Hello:
> >>
> >> I'm running a spam checker here (SpamAssassin 3.0.2) along with
> >> majordomo 1.94.5 and am wondering how I can get the major do disallow
> >> postings that are flagged as spam when they arrive but before they hit
> >> majordomo. I'm guessing its through Taboo Headers but I don't know
> >> what the regex should look like as I've never fiddled with those
> >> settings....Here are the things it will do to a subject and added
> >> headers that might work, I'm thinking subject and X-Spam-Flag: YES are
> >> good choices, but I don't know what the exclusions should look like.
> >>
> >> Can someone help out with that syntax from the below sample?
> >>
> >> Subject: ***** SPAM ***** JFDEMT, there's a message in your box!
> >> X-Spam-Flag: YES
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
