It's a lot easier to just set the specific bad guys to nomail (file away a
multiple command message template and just tack on the addresses for each
particular exclusion) for the one posting you don't want them to receive and
then set them back to mail afterward. They receive no indication of the brief
lapse and you don't run the risk of dumping anyone else by mistake.
Hilary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven W. Orr" <steveo@syslang.net>
To: "Daniel Kaliel" <Daniel.Kaliel@jjbedmonton.com>
Cc: <Majordomo-Users@greatcircle.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: Final Question
> On Wednesday, Feb 15th 2006 at 12:48 -0700, quoth Daniel Kaliel:
>
> =>The list works great thank to everyone. I already told my boss "no" but
> =>he asked that I ask the qroup anyways. His question was this.
> =>
> =>Is there a way to send an email to a list and have it exclude a few
> =>people on the list from getting the message? I like to send out
> =>property information on the list, but sometimes there are a few people I
> =>don't want the informtion to go to.
> =>
>
> Sure. Edit the subscriber list, send your message, and then restore the
> subscriber list. And in the meanwhile hope that someone else doesn't want
> to send a message to the same list.
>
> Or, create L1 which is the list minus the badguys and L2 which is the
> badguys. Then create L3 which is subscribed by only L1 and L2. Sending to
> L3 will send to both and when you want to send to just L1 then just send
> it to L1.
>
> --
> Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have
> .0.
> happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say Organ
> ..0
> Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are all-
> 000
> individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
> steveo at syslang.net
>
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|
