Daniel,
I have sendmail sending separate messages. What I am having a problem
with is the sendmail re-write rules. They are not parsing the headers
correctly.
Klingon I can speak and understand, sendmail re-write rules were
written by Cardasians or the Gou'ald!!
Qapla'
Pete
----
Peter P. Benac, CCNA
Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
Providing Network and Systems Project Management and Installation and Web
Hosting.
Phone: 919-618-2557
Web: http://www.emacolet.com
Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit
http://www.nmsusers.org
To have principles...
First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Liston [mailto:dliston@sonny.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 15:00
> To: ppbenac@emacolet.com; Majordomo-Users@greatcircle.com
> Subject: Re: MD, VERP and sendmail
>
> VERP is based on having a separate From: address for every
> message sent,
> implying that there is a separate message for every recipient
> of a list
> rather than one message with many recipients. I looked into
> this years
> ago without success. It goes against majordomo's design. Now, if you
> could get the actual MTA (sendmail, qmail, postfix, exim) to
> perform this
> task as it processes the recipient list for the distribution,
> it may be
> possible.
>
> Dan Liston
>
> Peter P. Benac wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Has anyone ever got VERP working with MD 1.94.5 and the
> current version
> > of sendmail?
> >
> > I am having issues getting the sendmail rules right?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pete
> > ----
> > Peter P. Benac, CCNA
> > Emacolet Networking Services, Inc
> > Providing Network and Systems Project Management and
> Installation and Web
> > Hosting.
> > Phone: 919-618-2557
> > Web: http://www.emacolet.com
> > Need quick reliable Systems or Network Management advice visit
> > http://www.nmsusers.org
> >
> > To have principles...
> > First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!!
> >
> >
> >
>
Follow-Ups:
References:
|
|