Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(March 2006)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: Re: Personal recipients?
From: karlp @ ourldsfamily . com
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:28:28 -0700 (MST)
To: majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <4408A232.3040000@sonny.org>
References: <1141407682.16000.20.camel@mandarin-04> <4408A232.3040000@sonny.org>
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4-rc1

On Fri, March 3, 2006 1:08 pm, Daniel Liston said:
> Derrick MacPherson wrote:
>
>> Is there a way to get majordomo to deliver to personal recipients
>> instead of the list name, in the To: field?
>>
>
> This question gets frequently asked/answered.  Dave Barr should add
> it to the FAQ.
>
> To rephrase your question, you want the final recipient's address
> in the To: header of the message that is distributed by majordomo.
>
> The short answer, is majordomo doesn't do this.  Majordomo does not
> have a switch, config, or plug-in to rewrite message headers.
>
> Majordomo did not send the original message, the author of that message
> did.  That author sent their message "To: yourlist@your.domain".  In
> many or most cases, the author does not know or care who is subscribed
> to your list, and has no intention of making the message appear to come
> directly from him/her to each subscriber.  They wrote to the list, not
> independent subscribers of that list.
>
> Majordomo simply distributes the original message, headers in tact, to
> the subscribed recipients of that list via your MTA as one message with
> a list of addresses to deliver to.

I have nearly 5000 listers on about 110 lists and my initial reaction is
that this would be a very bad idea. It seems to me that it would make the
list itself seem less involved and less a perceived service. Maybe I'm off
the mark, but why would you want to do this?

Karl


>
> Either majordomo "resend" would have to be rewritten to loop through
> your subscriber list addressing a separate message to each subscriber,
> or your MTA would have to be configured/rewritten to modify the To:
> header field of the message.  This might even be achievable by piping
> the message to another program between majordomo and your MTA.
>
> If anyone in majordomo land has written such a program, configured an
> MTA, or modified majordomo to support this request, please speak up.
>
> Dan Liston
>


-- 
karl
     _/  _/      _/      _/_/_/       ____________   __o
    _/ _/       _/      _/    _/     ____________  _-\<._
   _/_/        _/      _/_/_/                     (_)/ (_)
  _/ _/       _/      _/           ......................
 _/   _/ arl _/_/_/  _/ earson    KarlP@ourldsfamily.com
---
Senior Consulting Sys/DB Analyst
http://consulting.ourldsfamily.com
---
 My Thoughts on Terrorism In America right after 9/11/2001:
 http://www.ourldsfamily.com/wtc.shtml
---
 A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you.
 -Ramsey Clark
---




Follow-Ups:
References:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: Personal recipients?
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Next: Re: Personal recipients?
From: Derrick MacPherson <dmacpherson@mainframe.ca>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: Personal recipients?
From: Daniel Liston <dliston@sonny.org>
Next: Re: Personal recipients?
From: Derrick MacPherson <dmacpherson@mainframe.ca>