Great Circle Associates Majordomo-Users
(August 2006)
 

Indexed By Date: [Previous] [Next] Indexed By Thread: [Previous] [Next]

Subject: New question (exchenge to addressee of BOUNCE-mail) 2
From: "Masaaki OYA" <oya @ nro . nao . ac . jp>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:48:16 +0900
To: <majordomo-users @ greatcircle . com>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10605180834050.20439-100000@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us> <01e901c67b05$35252ec0$875e2885@nrose1p>

Dear Joe R. Jah and users

I'm OYA. I've a new question.
I imported the relevant parts of the patch to sequencer.
ML that used resend have no problem. But ML that used sequencer
have a problem. In detail, if non_member send to ML that used sequencer,
it's no problem. But when a member send to ML that used sequencer,
this mail sent to list-member and BOUNCE mail sent to sender.
How shall I do?

I'm Masaaki OYA. Thank you very much. I solved a problem.
I imported the relevant parts of the patch to sequencer. And I confirmed that a bounce-mail sended to sender and ML-owner.


Either switch back to resend, or if you can program in perl, import the
relevant parts of the patch to sequencer script.

> ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-patches/1.94.5/config_parse.pl-resend.3

Best Regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nobeyama Radio Observatory, in Japan Computer Support Team Masaaki Oya Tel. 81-267-98-4337 (NRO-SE-room) Fax. 81-267-98-2093  (  ,,  ) E-mail oya @ nro . nao . ac . jp ----------------------------------------------------------------------



Follow-Ups:
Indexed By Date Previous: Re: New Server VERY SLOW
From: karlp@ourldsfamily.com
Next: Re: New question (exchenge to addressee of BOUNCE-mail) 2
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us>
Indexed By Thread Previous: Re: New Server VERY SLOW
From: karlp@ourldsfamily.com
Next: Re: New question (exchenge to addressee of BOUNCE-mail) 2
From: "Joe R. Jah" <jjah@cloud.ccsf.cc.ca.us>