From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 09:26:42 2004 Received: from brmea-mail-4.sun.com (brmea-mail-4.Sun.COM [192.18.98.36]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732EB32C6A5; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:26:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from esunmail ([129.147.156.34]) by brmea-mail-4.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5OGOZ53018978; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:24:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from xpa-fe1 (esunmail [129.147.156.34]) by edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HZT00J9QN05CB@edgemail1.Central.Sun.COM>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:26:29 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [206.124.66.71] by mail.sun.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPSA id <0HZT00EV2N0413@mail.sun.net>; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:26:29 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:26:30 -0500 From: Daniel Liston Subject: LDAP To: majordomo-users@greatcircle.com, majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com Message-id: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a1) Gecko/20040520 X-Archive-Number: 200406/1 X-Sequence-Number: 49 Is majordomo II LDAP aware? Has anyone done any work to current or past majordomo versions to use LDAP based list configuration or membership? Dan Liston From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 09:38:00 2004 Received: from mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (mailbox.onlinepolicy.net [64.62.161.194]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEDF32C674; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (Postfix, from userid 504) id E19B0189474; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c-24-16-110-34.client.comcast.net [24.16.110.34]) by mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94F518946E; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40DB036B.9070202@queernet.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:38:03 -0700 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Liston Cc: majordomo-users@greatcircle.com, majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: LDAP References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200406/2 X-Sequence-Number: 50 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 09:46:29 2004 Received: from cyber-media.co.uk (cms2.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.247.204]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477CC32C612; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:46:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by cyber-media.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:46:13 +0100 thread-index: AcRaCsJFHDpAMifAQRGOWP46s9Tfvg== Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:46:12 +0100 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) Message-ID: <000601c45a0a$c2479360$0100000a@cybermedia.local> X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cc: , Subject: Re: LDAP X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Precedence: bulk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 Status: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2004 16:46:13.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2641C10:01C45A0A] X-Archive-Number: 200406/3 X-Sequence-Number: 51 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 10:00:58 2004 Received: from cyber-media.co.uk (cms2.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.247.204]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC8E32C303; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by cyber-media.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:00:50 +0100 thread-index: AcRaCsJFHDpAMifAQRGOWP46s9Tfvg== Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:00:50 +0100 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Message-ID: <000301c45a0c$cd7c7690$0100000a@cybermedia.local> Cc: , Subject: Re: LDAP X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Precedence: bulk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2004 16:46:13.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2641C10:01C45A0A] Precedence: bulk Status: X-Archive-Number: 200406/4 X-Sequence-Number: 52 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 10:15:22 2004 Received: from cyber-media.co.uk (cms2.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.247.204]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F66C32C192; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:15:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by cyber-media.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:15:16 +0100 thread-index: AcRaCsJFHDpAMifAQRGOWP46s9Tfvg== Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:15:15 +0100 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Message-ID: <000401c45a0e$d1256f70$0100000a@cybermedia.local> Cc: , Subject: Re: LDAP X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Precedence: bulk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2004 16:46:13.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2641C10:01C45A0A] Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Status: X-Archive-Number: 200406/5 X-Sequence-Number: 53 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 10:30:41 2004 Received: from cyber-media.co.uk (cms2.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.247.204]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7032532C1F8; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by cyber-media.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:30:37 +0100 thread-index: AcRaCsJFHDpAMifAQRGOWP46s9Tfvg== Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:30:37 +0100 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Message-ID: <000101c45a10$f6a63200$0100000a@cybermedia.local> Cc: , Subject: Re: LDAP X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Precedence: bulk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2004 16:46:13.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2641C10:01C45A0A] Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Status: X-Archive-Number: 200406/6 X-Sequence-Number: 54 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jun 24 10:45:58 2004 Received: from cyber-media.co.uk (cms2.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.247.204]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C353F32C2B3; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by cyber-media.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:45:54 +0100 thread-index: AcRaCsJFHDpAMifAQRGOWP46s9Tfvg== Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:45:53 +0100 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cc: , Message-ID: <000001c45a13$18bbb610$0100000a@cybermedia.local> Subject: Re: LDAP X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Exchange 2000 References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Precedence: bulk X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.132 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2004 16:46:13.0073 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2641C10:01C45A0A] Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Precedence: bulk Status: X-Archive-Number: 200406/7 X-Sequence-Number: 55 Daniel Liston wrote: > Is majordomo II LDAP aware? No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it supports multiple types of back-end stores. From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Fri Jun 25 16:04:06 2004 Received: from mail.sonny.com (DTG-38.216-16-61.dtgnet.com [216.16.61.38]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20F632C212; Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sonny.org (dad.liston.nu [192.168.1.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.sonny.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5PN45WV020436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=OK); Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:04:07 -0500 Message-ID: <40DCAF63.8060500@sonny.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:04:03 -0500 From: Daniel Liston User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: majordomo-users@greatcircle.com, majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com Subject: Re: LDAP References: <40DB00B6.2040108@sonny.org> <40DB036B.9070202@queernet.org> In-Reply-To: <40DB036B.9070202@queernet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200406/8 X-Sequence-Number: 56 Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > Daniel Liston wrote: > >> Is majordomo II LDAP aware? > > > No, but it's open to having LDAP drivers written for it, in that it > supports multiple types of back-end stores. I would not have viewed this as being a driver, but that does put my question in a different perspective. Since LDAP maintains each object as a set of attribute:value pairs that follow a specific schema, I will probably work on defining schema first, then the methods of access for reads and writes. This will probably include user object dependencies, and their associated access controls. Dan Liston