From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Wed Jul 14 17:34:48 2004 Received: from mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (mailbox.onlinepolicy.net [64.62.161.194]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCB132C503 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (Postfix, from userid 504) id 92EC51885B6; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (c-24-16-110-34.client.comcast.net [24.16.110.34]) by mailbox.onlinepolicy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693111885B5 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <40F5D119.3060706@queernet.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:33 -0700 From: "Roger B.A. Klorese" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6+ (Windows/20040626) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com Subject: Current maintainer of 1.94.x? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive-Number: 200407/1 X-Sequence-Number: 57 Are there patches outstanding that could be rolled up into a new version? I ask because of a secondary ulterior motive: using the in-package doc to encourage testing and migration to Majordomo 2... From majordomo-workers-owner@greatcircle.com Thu Jul 15 12:34:55 2004 Received: from sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us (sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.211]) by mycroft.greatcircle.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4EE32C3C3 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:34:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jjah@localhost) by sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6FJYnh09553; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 12:34:49 -0700 (PDT) From: "Joe R. Jah" To: "Roger B.A. Klorese" Cc: Subject: Re: Current maintainer of 1.94.x? In-Reply-To: <40F5D119.3060706@queernet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Archive-Number: 200407/2 X-Sequence-Number: 58 On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote: > Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:34:33 -0700 > From: Roger B.A. Klorese > To: majordomo-workers@greatcircle.com > Subject: Current maintainer of 1.94.x? > > Are there patches outstanding that could be rolled up into a new version? Aside from the patches in ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/majordomo-patches/1.94.5/ ? > I ask because of a secondary ulterior motive: using the in-package doc > to encourage testing and migration to Majordomo 2... I applaud your ulterior motive as well;) however this list, majordomo-workers, has been dormant for years now; I do not think you would reach many;( Any way, if you are serious about rolling up a new 1.9x version you should get Chan and/or Brent on board;) Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jjah@sol.ccsf.cc.ca.us